linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] drm/msm: mdss: Add Milos support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f3c7bc8-8c7b-4c47-95de-7a8ac6dc3c57@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 10:09:59 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
        Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov
 <lumag@...nel.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] drm/msm: mdss: Add Milos support

On 12/20/25 5:52 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 05:41:09PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> Add support for MDSS on Milos.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> 
> Though 14000 seems lower than the value for all other platforms.

IIUC it's essentially "nonzero" or "first-level-above-just-nonzero"

The downstream DT also defines a 140_000 and a 310_000 point.. though
the middle one is never(?) used and the latter one is only used during
UEFI handoff and upon the first commit after (runtime) resume

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>

Konrad