[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251222111044-611cdccb-327c-4ed8-a75b-1a65aa353802@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 11:22:16 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: uapi: avoid usage of libc types
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 03:39:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 09:00:33AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Using libc types and headers from the UAPI headers is problematic as it
> > introduces a dependency on a full C toolchain.
> >
> > On Linux 'unsigned long' works as a replacement for 'uintptr_t' and does
> > not depend on libc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
>
>
> are you fixing other uses of uintptr_t ?
I am focussing on UAPI headers which include libc headers.
virtio_ring.h seems to be the only such header which uses uintptr_t.
There are a few other UAPI headers which reference uintptr_t, but only
in comments or macros.
uintptr_t in regular kernel code is out of scope for me.
While it is iffy, it doesn't actually hurt.
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists