[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c3d6c2c2273eebcc207ce5010ed90ee80460bed.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 16:26:32 +0100
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven
Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>, Clark
Williams <williams@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] rv: Add Hybrid Automata monitor type
On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 12:57 +0700, Nam Cao wrote:
> Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com> writes:
> > +static inline void ha_start_timer_ns(struct ha_monitor *ha_mon, enum envs
> > env,
> > + u64 expire, u64 time_ns)
> > +{
> > + u64 passed = ha_invariant_passed_ns(ha_mon, env, expire, time_ns);
> > +
> > + ha_start_timer_jiffy(ha_mon, ENV_MAX_STORED,
> > + nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed) + 1,
> > time_ns);
>
> What is the +1 for? I guess to prevent it being rounded down to zero? If
> so, maybe we should do
>
> nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed + TICK_NSEC - 1)
>
> instead.
Yeah that was the reason and your suggestion is actually cleaner.
Thanks,
Gabriele
>
> Anyway, no big deal:
> Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists