linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Clean up types in headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMEXYWeGqq3_k55u3poOBtUQY3U6CxO1R3O--vjttap_=NCsNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:27:27 +0000
From: Benjamin Philip <benjamin.philip495@...il.com>
To: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Clean up types in headers

Benjamin Philip <benjamin.philip495@...il.com> writes:

> This commit replaces the uint32_t standard type with preferred u32
> kernel type, fixing the following checkpatch check:
>
> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t'
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Philip <benjamin.philip495@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h
> index 017644323d46..6ea4bceafab2 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h
> @@ -58,19 +58,19 @@ struct tlmi_cert_guids {
>  #define TLMI_PWDCFG_MODE_MULTICERT 3
>
>  struct tlmi_pwdcfg_core {
> -	uint32_t password_mode;
> -	uint32_t password_state;
> -	uint32_t min_length;
> -	uint32_t max_length;
> -	uint32_t supported_encodings;
> -	uint32_t supported_keyboard;
> +	u32 password_mode;
> +	u32 password_state;
> +	u32 min_length;
> +	u32 max_length;
> +	u32 supported_encodings;
> +	u32 supported_keyboard;
>  };
>
>  struct tlmi_pwdcfg_ext {
> -	uint32_t hdd_user_password;
> -	uint32_t hdd_master_password;
> -	uint32_t nvme_user_password;
> -	uint32_t nvme_master_password;
> +	u32 hdd_user_password;
> +	u32 hdd_master_password;
> +	u32 nvme_user_password;
> +	u32 nvme_master_password;
>  };
>
>  struct tlmi_pwdcfg {
> --
> 2.52.0

I've seemed to have botched the In-Reply-To header for this email
somehow. Please ignore. Sorry!

-- bp