linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Doc:it_IT: Do not reference kernel.h anymore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h5tgubkq.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 14:34:29 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko
 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc:it_IT: Do not reference kernel.h anymore

Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it> writes:

>>I'm unconvinced about "file di intestazione" based on my own
>>understanding of the language... but, in a case like this, I will defer
>>to the creator and maintainer of the translation.
>
> Due to my explanation in the previous message, and after your answer,
> I have the feeling it may sounds like I'm making up words needing
> persuasion. Probably I'm misunderstanding. Just in case, please allow
> me a clarification.

No, that was not my intent at all.  It's a term I haven't encountered
before, but that doesn't mean you made it up :)

Thanks,

jon