[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aU_tUUSucAQsi5mq@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 16:29:37 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Shyam Sundar S K <shyam-sundar.s-k@....com>,
Nirujogi Pratap <pratap.nirujogi@....com>, Bin Du <bin.du@....com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Hans Hu <hanshu@...oxin.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: designware-amdisp: use i2c_adapter_dev()
On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 11:08:21AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Use i2c_adapter_dev() where applicable in order to avoid direct
> dereferencing of struct device embedded within struct i2c_adapter.
...
> - ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&adap->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev));
> + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(i2c_adapter_dev(adap), ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev));
> adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
Why not just replace these with i2c_dev_set_node()?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists