linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] pinctrl: samsung: rename gs101_pinctrl_* to exynos9_pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20d454a7-1606-4418-8996-6755c1ea3180@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 12:43:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
 alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
 semen.protsenko@...aro.org, ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com
Cc: ryu.real@...sung.com, d7271.choe@...sung.com, shin.son@...sung.com,
 jaewon02.kim@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] pinctrl: samsung: rename gs101_pinctrl_* to
 exynos9_pinctrl_*

On 02/12/2025 10:36, Youngmin Nam wrote:
> The suspend/resume helpers named gs101_pinctrl_{suspend,resume} are not
> GS101-specific. They implement the generic save/restore sequence used by
> Exynos9-style controllers that have EINT filter configuration
> (eint_fltcon) to preserve.
> 
> Rename them to exynos9_pinctrl_{suspend,resume} and update all users:

Why? Exynos9 does not exist, there is no such SoC. All other SoCs can
use GS101 naming, just like GS101 could use Exynos-foo. You need to come
with a reason why Exynos9 is better than GS101.


Best regards,
Krzysztof