[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACSVV03FfvZVzuKGfaJrsXmE7VVxEF5zN4-R7h1PXA11jOO3gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 06:59:10 -0800
From: Rob Clark <rob.clark@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@...il.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display/msm/gpu: Narrow reg and
reg-names for Adreno 610.0 and alike
On Sat, Dec 27, 2025 at 11:56 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 27/12/2025 23:01, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 27, 2025 at 3:05 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> DTS files for qcom,adreno-610.0 and qcom,adreno-07000200 contain only one
> >> "reg" entry, not two, and the binding defines the second entry in
> >> "reg-names" differently than top-level part, so just simplify it and
> >> narrow to only one entry.
> >
> > I'll defer to Akhil about whether this is actually needed (vs just
> > incomplete gpu devcoredump support for certain GPUs). In general
> > cx_dbgc is needed to capture state for gpu devcoredump state
> > snapshots, but not directly used in normal operations. It seems
> > similar to the situation with mapping gpucc as part of gmu, ie. not
> > something the CPU normally deals with directly, but necessary to
> > capture crash state.
>
> I don't get why binding was added with cx_dbgc, but DTS not. Neither
> binding nor DTS depends on actual usage, so I assume someone
> intentionally did not want DTS to contain cx_dbgc and binding should
> follow. Otherwise we should make the DTS complete and make the binding
> strict (leading to warnings if DTS is not updated).
I'm not sure about the history.. but I can say that cx_dbgc is only
used for gpu state snapshot / devcoredump. So it would be easy to not
notice if it were missing.
We have a similar slightly ugly thing where gpucc is included in the
gmu map.. only for devcoredump. Maybe we need a different way to
handle these things that are only mapped for state capture?
BR,
-R
Powered by blists - more mailing lists