linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,adsp: Allow cx-supply on qcom,sdm845-slpi-pas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd693ce4-3cf6-4a58-8c94-6f73186fab7d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:45:32 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,adsp: Allow cx-supply on
 qcom,sdm845-slpi-pas

On 29/12/2025 16:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 12/29/25 4:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> One SDM845 board uses cx-supply, which is not allowed by the bindings,
>> as reported by dtbs_check:
>>
>>   sdm845-samsung-starqltechn.dtb: remoteproc@...0000 (qcom,sdm845-slpi-pas): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('cx-supply' was unexpected)
>>
>> The SDM845 SLPI binding already allows lcx and lmx domains, thus the
>> cx-supply seems like a fake name for something else, e.g. some
>> enable pin.  The qcom_q6v5_pas.c driver parses cx-supply, so it is an
>> established ABI, therefore document it for this device only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
> 
> fyi https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CABTCjFBQOq1pmdou_17ZOV3MgTxD_2byAY4RitqPVN5FYdRuJg@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> but this one seems to be more tightened, that's preferred


Heh... I think you need second or third pair of hands applying patches -
6 pages of patches with "New" status:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/

Best regards,
Krzysztof