lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c8edd12-0933-4aae-8af3-307b133dce27@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 12:02:22 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Yohei Kojima <yk@...oj.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/5] net: netdevsim: fix inconsistent carrier state
 after link/unlink

> Thank you for the quick reply. I don't intend for this patch to be
> backported to the stable tree. My understanding was that bugfix patches
> to the net tree should have Fixes: tag for historical tracking.
> 
> > 
> > netdevsim is not a real device. Do its bugs actually bother people?
> 
> This patch fixes a real bug that is seen when a developer tries to test
> TFO or netdevsim tests on NetworkManager-enabled systems: it causes
> false positives in kselftests on such systems.

O.K, then keep the Fixes tag and submit it for net. However, the tests
should be considered development work, and submitted to net-next, if
they are not fixes. Please split this into two series.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ