[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXuLwC_BR_aJwzgnvLqi4HQbtkB_67ESAm8xtTwoTQ3zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:52:32 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sh_tmu: Always leave device running
after probe
Hi Niklas,
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 23:14, Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se> wrote:
> The TMU device can be used as both a clocksource and a clockevent
> provider. The driver tries to be smart and power itself on and off, as
> well as enabling and disabling its clock when it's not in operation.
> This behavior is slightly altered if the TMU is used as an early
> platform device in which case the device is left powered on after probe,
> but the clock is still enabled and disabled at runtime.
>
> This has worked for a long time, but recent improvements in PREEMPT_RT
> and PROVE_LOCKING have highlighted an issue. As the TMU registers itself
> as a clockevent provider, clockevents_register_device(), it needs to use
> raw spinlocks internally as this is the context of which the clockevent
> framework interacts with the TMU driver. However in the context of
> holding a raw spinlock the TMU driver can't really manage its power
> state or clock with calls to pm_runtime_*() and clk_*() as these calls
> end up in other platform drivers using regular spinlocks to control
> power and clocks.
>
> This mix of spinlock contexts trips a lockdep warning.
>
> =============================
> [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
> 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> swapper/0/0 is trying to lock:
> ffff000008c9e180 (&dev->power.lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88
> other info that might help us debug this:
> context-{5:5}
> 1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
> ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM CryptoCell 630P Driver: HW version 0xAF400001/0xDCC63000, Driver version 5.0
> #0: ffff8000817ec298
> ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM ccree device initialized
> (tick_broadcast_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xa4/0x3a8
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 PREEMPT
> Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT)
> Call trace:
> show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C)
> dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90
> dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
> __lock_acquire+0x904/0x1584
> lock_acquire+0x220/0x34c
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x80
> __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88
> sh_tmu_clock_event_set_oneshot+0x84/0xd4
> clockevents_switch_state+0xfc/0x13c
> tick_broadcast_set_event+0x30/0xa4
> __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x1e0/0x3a8
> tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x30/0x40
> cpuidle_enter_state+0x40c/0x680
> cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x40
> do_idle+0x1f4/0x280
> cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40
> kernel_init+0x0/0x130
> do_one_initcall+0x0/0x230
> __primary_switched+0x88/0x90
>
> For non-PREEMPT_RT builds this is not really an issue, but for
> PREEMPT_RT builds where normal spinlocks can sleep this might be an
> issue. Be cautious and always leave the power and clock running after
> probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Thanks, splat gone on R-Mobile A1, and no regressions seen on other
platforms using the TMU (R-Car H1, rts7751r2d/qemu).
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists