[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd9f0b37-001e-4721-82b7-ee29379eb9a9@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 19:52:51 +0530
From: Swamil Jain <s-jain1@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <jyri.sarha@....fi>, <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
<airlied@...il.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>, <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
<mripard@...nel.org>, <tzimmermann@...e.de>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <devarsht@...com>, <praneeth@...com>, <bb@...com>,
<vigneshr@...com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add AM62L DSS support
Hi Rob,
On 12/30/25 07:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 07:01:50PM +0530, Swamil Jain wrote:
>> Update the AM65x DSS bindings to support AM62L which has a single video
>> port. Add conditional constraints for AM62L.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swamil Jain <s-jain1@...com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml | 95 +++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>> index 38fcee91211e..ce39690df4e5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>> @@ -36,34 +36,50 @@ properties:
>> reg:
>> description:
>> Addresses to each DSS memory region described in the SoC's TRM.
>> - items:
>> - - description: common DSS register area
>> - - description: VIDL1 light video plane
>> - - description: VID video plane
>> - - description: OVR1 overlay manager for vp1
>> - - description: OVR2 overlay manager for vp2
>> - - description: VP1 video port 1
>> - - description: VP2 video port 2
>> - - description: common1 DSS register area
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - description: common DSS register area
>> + - description: VIDL1 light video plane
>> + - description: VID video plane
>> + - description: OVR1 overlay manager for vp1
>> + - description: OVR2 overlay manager for vp2
>> + - description: VP1 video port 1
>> + - description: VP2 video port 2
>> + - description: common1 DSS register area
>> + - items:
>> + - description: common DSS register area
>> + - description: VIDL1 light video plane
>> + - description: OVR1 overlay manager for vp1
>> + - description: VP1 video port 1
>> + - description: common1 DSS register area
>>
>> reg-names:
>> - items:
>> - - const: common
>> - - const: vidl1
>> - - const: vid
>> - - const: ovr1
>> - - const: ovr2
>> - - const: vp1
>> - - const: vp2
>> - - const: common1
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - const: common
>> + - const: vidl1
>> + - const: vid
>> + - const: ovr1
>> + - const: ovr2
>> + - const: vp1
>> + - const: vp2
>> + - const: common1
>> + - items:
>> + - const: common
>> + - const: vidl1
>> + - const: ovr1
>> + - const: vp1
>> + - const: common1
>>
>> clocks:
>> + minItems: 2
>> items:
>> - description: fck DSS functional clock
>> - description: vp1 Video Port 1 pixel clock
>> - description: vp2 Video Port 2 pixel clock
>>
>> clock-names:
>> + minItems: 2
>> items:
>> - const: fck
>> - const: vp1
>> @@ -84,7 +100,8 @@ properties:
>> maxItems: 1
>> description: phandle to the associated power domain
>>
>> - dma-coherent: true
>> + dma-coherent:
>> + type: boolean
>>
>> ports:
>> $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
>> @@ -195,6 +212,46 @@ allOf:
>> port@0:
>> properties:
>> endpoint@1: false
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: ti,am62l-dss
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + clock-names:
>> + maxItems: 2
>> + clocks:
>> + maxItems: 2
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 5
>
> reg-names:
> minItems: 8
> else:
> properties:
> reg:
> minItems: 8
> reg-names:
> minItems: 8
>
> clocks needs similar constraints...
Sure, will add in v2.
>
>> +
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: ti,am62l-dss
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + reg-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: common
>> + - const: vidl1
>> + - const: ovr1
>> + - const: vp1
>> + - const: common1
>> + else:
>> + properties:
>> + reg-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: common
>> + - const: vidl1
>> + - const: vid
>> + - const: ovr1
>> + - const: ovr2
>> + - const: vp1
>> + - const: vp2
>> + - const: common1
>
> Why are you defining the names twice?
>
For AM62L we don't have "vid", "ovr2" and "vp2", the dtbs_check will fail.
Could you please suggest a better way?
Regards,
Swamil.
> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists