[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD++jLmNGrDt3_w=DFnBnjEuz3LN-=uc1o9KHv1j=4gbGPoPQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 22:37:15 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 02/16] pinctrl: aspeed: g5: Constrain LPC binding
revision workaround to AST2500
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 9:46 AM Andrew Jeffery
<andrew@...econstruct.com.au> wrote:
> Discovering a phandle to an AST2400 or AST2600 LPC node indicates an
> error for the purpose of the AST2500 pinctrl driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>
Also pretty obviously correct, can't I just apply this one?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists