linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 03/16] pinctrl: aspeed: g5: Allow use of LPC node instead of LPC host controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD++jL=TXQyGD5nSdg37KK=OrUJDwi=2pXQciLr+udC9hjCVkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 22:38:12 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/16] pinctrl: aspeed: g5: Allow use of LPC node
 instead of LPC host controller

On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 9:46 AM Andrew Jeffery
<andrew@...econstruct.com.au> wrote:

> There's currently a wart where the Aspeed LPC host controller has no
> binding specified, but the pinctrl binding depends on referencing its
> node.
>
> Allow specification of a phandle to the parent LPC controller instead.
> Fall back to testing for a compatible parent node if the provided
> phandle doesn't directly resolve to the LPC controller node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>

I guess when this is non-RFC I will just apply these two patches.

Yours,
Linus Walleij