linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm: dts: mstar: infinity: Correct opp table name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fe88cb4d-19f9-413a-8cd1-aa75b3b421bc@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 11:03:39 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Cc: krzk+dt@...nel.org, romain.perier@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm: dts: mstar: infinity: Correct opp table name

On 31/12/2025 11:17, Daniel Palmer wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 at 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>> I meant, two commits should be rather squashed. If you intend to rename
>> the nodes, fix all names to be generic, not only some.
> 
> There are 3 commits that correct node names:
> arm: dts: mstar: breadbee: Correct regulator names
> arm: dts: mstar: breadbee: Correct LED names
> arm: dts: mstar: infinity: Correct opp table name
> 
> The top two are in the same dts board file, the bottom one is in a
> different dtsi file for a chip family.

You are right, so it's fine.
> Should I squash all of them into one commit, squash the top two for
> the same board into one commit?



Best regards,
Krzysztof