[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkn=ZMd6v=yX_KbfynKq7quBKUnCBDJBaU0LyYYMbKEXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 19:17:48 +0900
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: krzk+dt@...nel.org, romain.perier@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm: dts: mstar: infinity: Correct opp table name
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 at 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> I meant, two commits should be rather squashed. If you intend to rename
> the nodes, fix all names to be generic, not only some.
There are 3 commits that correct node names:
arm: dts: mstar: breadbee: Correct regulator names
arm: dts: mstar: breadbee: Correct LED names
arm: dts: mstar: infinity: Correct opp table name
The top two are in the same dts board file, the bottom one is in a
different dtsi file for a chip family.
Should I squash all of them into one commit, squash the top two for
the same board into one commit?
Cheers,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists