lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkn=ZMd6v=yX_KbfynKq7quBKUnCBDJBaU0LyYYMbKEXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 19:17:48 +0900
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: krzk+dt@...nel.org, romain.perier@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm: dts: mstar: infinity: Correct opp table name

Hi Krzysztof,

On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 at 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> I meant, two commits should be rather squashed. If you intend to rename
> the nodes, fix all names to be generic, not only some.

There are 3 commits that correct node names:
arm: dts: mstar: breadbee: Correct regulator names
arm: dts: mstar: breadbee: Correct LED names
arm: dts: mstar: infinity: Correct opp table name

The top two are in the same dts board file, the bottom one is in a
different dtsi file for a chip family.
Should I squash all of them into one commit, squash the top two for
the same board into one commit?

Cheers,

Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ