linux-kernel - Re: [v3 0/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix multiple memory leaks in error paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <411ef9b1-ff0c-4f68-8af8-f3a478ca0d7d@web.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 14:30:36 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@....edu.cn>, Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 Justin Tee <justin.tee@...adcom.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Paul Ely <paul.ely@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 0/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix multiple memory leaks in error paths

>> …
>>> These issues were identified during static analysis.
>>
>> How do you think about to share further information according to
>> your source code analysis approach?
…
> Thank you for your inquiry.
> 
> I believe the commit messages in each individual patch within this series 
> already provide a clear and specific description of the identified issues 
> and the analysis of the failure paths.

You presented interesting development ideas.
Will any related concerns become relevant here?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/researcher-guidelines.rst?h=v6.19-rc3#n5

Did your analysis approach get a corresponding name?

Regards,
Markus