linux-kernel - Re: [v3 0/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix multiple memory leaks in error paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20260103152514.304387-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Sat,  3 Jan 2026 15:25:14 +0000
From: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
To: markus.elfring@....de
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
	jianhao.xu@....edu.cn,
	justin.tee@...adcom.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com,
	paul.ely@...adcom.com,
	zilin@....edu.cn
Subject: Re: [v3 0/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix multiple memory leaks in error paths

On Sat, Jan 03, 2026 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> You presented interesting development ideas.
> Will any related concerns become relevant here?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/researcher-guidelines.rst?h=v6.19-rc3#n5
> 
> Did your analysis approach get a corresponding name?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

We are aware of these ethics requirements and strictly respect them.
For example, we responsibly disclose our findings (i.e., bugs, in the 
form of patches), and we will make our paper and code public after 
publication. However, we cannot disclose our tool at this moment because 
our research is still ongoing.

Regards,
Zilin Guan