[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aV05_2Lw6x8Qr_Je@skinsburskii.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 08:36:15 -0800
From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Anirudh Rayabharam <anirudh@...rudhrb.com>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
decui@...rosoft.com, longli@...rosoft.com,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mshv: handle gpa intercepts for arm64
On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 07:21:41AM +0000, Anirudh Rayabharam wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 09:04:02AM -0800, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 12:28:37PM +0000, Anirudh Rayabharam wrote:
> > > From: Anirudh Rayabharam (Microsoft) <anirudh@...rudhrb.com>
> > >
> > > The mshv driver now uses movable pages for guests. For arm64 guests
> > > to be functional, handle gpa intercepts for arm64 too (the current
> > > code implements handling only for x86).
> > >
> > > Move some arch-agnostic functions out of #ifdefs so that they can be
> > > re-used.
> > >
> > > Fixes: b9a66cd5ccbb ("mshv: Add support for movable memory regions")
> >
> > I'm not sure that this patch needs "Fixes" tag as it introduced new
> > functionality rather than fixing a bug.
>
> This does fix a bug. The commit mentioned here regressed arm64 guests because
> it didn't have GPA intercept handling for arm64.
>
Were ARM guests functional before this commit? If yes, then I agree that
this patch fixes a bug. If no, then this is just adding new
functionality.
I had an impression ARM is not yet supported in MSHV, so please clarify.
Thanks,
Stanislav
> Thanks,
> Anirudh.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stanislav
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam (Microsoft) <anirudh@...rudhrb.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> > > index 9cf28a3f12fe..f8c4c2ae2cc9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> > > @@ -608,7 +608,6 @@ mshv_partition_region_by_gfn(struct mshv_partition *partition, u64 gfn)
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > static struct mshv_mem_region *
> > > mshv_partition_region_by_gfn_get(struct mshv_partition *p, u64 gfn)
> > > {
> > > @@ -640,12 +639,17 @@ static bool mshv_handle_gpa_intercept(struct mshv_vp *vp)
> > > {
> > > struct mshv_partition *p = vp->vp_partition;
> > > struct mshv_mem_region *region;
> > > - struct hv_x64_memory_intercept_message *msg;
> > > bool ret;
> > > u64 gfn;
> > > -
> > > - msg = (struct hv_x64_memory_intercept_message *)
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
> > > + struct hv_x64_memory_intercept_message *msg =
> > > + (struct hv_x64_memory_intercept_message *)
> > > + vp->vp_intercept_msg_page->u.payload;
> > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> > > + struct hv_arm64_memory_intercept_message *msg =
> > > + (struct hv_arm64_memory_intercept_message *)
> > > vp->vp_intercept_msg_page->u.payload;
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > gfn = HVPFN_DOWN(msg->guest_physical_address);
> > >
> > > @@ -663,9 +667,6 @@ static bool mshv_handle_gpa_intercept(struct mshv_vp *vp)
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > -#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
> > > -static bool mshv_handle_gpa_intercept(struct mshv_vp *vp) { return false; }
> > > -#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
> > >
> > > static bool mshv_vp_handle_intercept(struct mshv_vp *vp)
> > > {
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists