[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <z3tktit6jkxrkre4gm666aw3ql3plyhs6266cu2itrbjbj2das@yjp2pyesoszn>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 04:51:18 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: srini@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, quic_bkumar@...cinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_chennak@...cinc.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] misc: fastrpc: Support mapping
userspace-allocated buffers
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 04:32:25PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> Currently, FastRPC only supports mapping buffers allocated by the
> kernel. This limits flexibility for applications that allocate memory
> in userspace using rpcmem or DMABUF and need to share it with the DSP.
Hmm, for DMABUF we need _import_ support rather than support for mapping
of userspace-allocated buffers.
> Add support for mapping and unmapping userspace-allocated buffers to
> the DSP through SMMU. This includes handling map requests for rpcmem
> and DMABUF-backed memory and providing corresponding unmap
> functionality.
For me this definitely looks like a step back. For drm/accel we are
going to have GEM-managed buffers only. Why do we need to handle
userspace-allocated buffers here?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -1989,25 +2020,69 @@ static int fastrpc_req_buf_alloc(struct fastrpc_user *fl,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int fastrpc_req_mmap(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp)
> +static int fastrpc_req_map_create(struct fastrpc_user *fl,
> + struct fastrpc_req_mmap req,
> + char __user *argp)
> {
> - struct fastrpc_req_mmap req;
> + struct fastrpc_map *map = NULL;
> + struct device *dev = fl->sctx->dev;
> + u64 raddr = 0;
> int err;
>
> - if (copy_from_user(&req, argp, sizeof(req)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + err = fastrpc_map_create(fl, req.fd, req.size, 0, &map);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map buffer, fd = %d\n", req.fd);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = fastrpc_req_map_dsp(fl, map->phys, map->size, req.flags,
> + req.vaddrin, &raddr);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_invoke;
>
> - if (req.flags != ADSP_MMAP_ADD_PAGES && req.flags != ADSP_MMAP_REMOTE_HEAP_ADDR) {
> - dev_err(fl->sctx->dev, "flag not supported 0x%x\n", req.flags);
> + /* update the buffer to be able to deallocate the memory on the DSP */
> + map->raddr = (u64)raddr;
Which type are you converting? And why?
>
> - return -EINVAL;
> + /* let the client know the address to use */
> + req.vaddrout = raddr;
> + dev_dbg(dev, "mmap OK: raddr=%p [len=0x%08llx]\n",
> + (void *)(unsigned long)map->raddr, map->size);
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(argp, &req, sizeof(req))) {
> + err = -EFAULT;
> + goto err_copy;
> }
>
> - err = fastrpc_req_buf_alloc(fl, req, argp);
> + return 0;
> +err_copy:
> + fastrpc_req_munmap_dsp(fl, map->raddr, map->size);
> +err_invoke:
> + fastrpc_map_put(map);
>
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int fastrpc_req_mmap(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp)
> +{
> + struct fastrpc_req_mmap req;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&req, argp, sizeof(req)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if ((req.flags == ADSP_MMAP_ADD_PAGES ||
> + req.flags == ADSP_MMAP_REMOTE_HEAP_ADDR)) {
Side note: why are these flags not defined in the uABI header?
> + err = fastrpc_req_buf_alloc(fl, req, argp);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists