[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aV6ALdPCjaAYHM7-@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 17:47:57 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: bus: Use OF match data for PRP0001 matched
devices
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 05:33:18PM +0530, Kartik Rajput wrote:
> When a device is matched via PRP0001, the driver's OF (DT) match table
> must be used to obtain the device match data. If a driver provides both
> an acpi_match_table and an of_match_table, the current
> acpi_device_get_match_data() path consults the driver's acpi_match_table
> and returns NULL (no ACPI ID matches).
Since we have both tables, why the actual ACPI HID of the device in question
(actually which one?) can't be used?
> Explicitly detect PRP0001 and fetch match data from the driver's
> of_match_table via acpi_of_device_get_match_data().
In principle we can go this way, but can you tell a bit more of a story?
Why the device in question can't use existed or a newly allocated ACPI HID for
that?
...
> @@ -1031,8 +1031,9 @@ const void *acpi_device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
> {
> const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_ids = dev->driver->acpi_match_table;
> const struct acpi_device_id *match;
> + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
Please, keep it in reversed xmas tree order.
> - if (!acpi_ids)
> + if (!strcmp(ACPI_DT_NAMESPACE_HID, acpi_device_hid(adev)))
> return acpi_of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>
> match = acpi_match_device(acpi_ids, dev);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists