lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a794af2f-beba-45ba-8ce3-4bf5bb0111c9@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 16:53:40 +0530
From: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
 mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
 thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: bus: Use OF match data for PRP0001 matched
 devices

On 07/01/26 18:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 1:03 PM Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> When a device is matched via PRP0001, the driver's OF (DT) match table
>> must be used to obtain the device match data. If a driver provides both
>> an acpi_match_table and an of_match_table, the current
>> acpi_device_get_match_data() path consults the driver's acpi_match_table
>> and returns NULL (no ACPI ID matches).
>>
>> Explicitly detect PRP0001 and fetch match data from the driver's
>> of_match_table via acpi_of_device_get_match_data().
>>
>> Fixes: 886ca88be6b3 ("ACPI / bus: Respect PRP0001 when retrieving device match data")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>          * Fix build errors.
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> index 5e110badac7b..6658c4339656 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> @@ -1031,8 +1031,9 @@ const void *acpi_device_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
>>   {
>>          const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_ids = dev->driver->acpi_match_table;
>>          const struct acpi_device_id *match;
>> +       struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
>>
>> -       if (!acpi_ids)
> 
> You still need to check acpi_ids against NULL or (better) check adev
> against NULL.
> 

Hi Rafael,

Thanks for reviewing the patch.

Yes, it looks like adev should be NULL-checked. acpi_of_device_get_match_data()
also uses the adev reference and passes it to acpi_of_match_device(), which checks
it against NULL.

I will make this change in the next revision.

Thanks,
Kartik

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ