[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260107074438.GA34085@wp.pl>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 08:44:38 +0100
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>
To: Tuo Li <islituo@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlegacy: 3945-rs: fix possible null-pointer
dereferences in il3945_rs_get_rate()
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 03:10:01PM +0800, Tuo Li wrote:
> In this function, il_sta is assigned to rs_sta, and rs_sta is dereferenced
> at several points. If il_sta is NULL, this can lead to null-pointer
> dereferences. To fix this issue, add an early check for il_sta and return
> if it is NULL, consistent with the handling in il3945_rs_tx_status().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tuo Li <islituo@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c
> index 1826c37c090c..c13268093a6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c
> @@ -626,8 +626,13 @@ il3945_rs_get_rate(void *il_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, void *il_sta,
>
> D_RATE("enter\n");
>
> + if (!il_sta) {
> + D_RATE("leave: No STA il data available!\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /* Treat uninitialized rate scaling data same as non-existing. */
> - if (rs_sta && !rs_sta->il) {
> + if (!rs_sta->il) {
> D_RATE("Rate scaling information not initialized yet.\n");
> il_sta = NULL;
Please also change to return here instead of setting il_sta to NULL.
And make D_RATE messages similar to il3945_rs_tx_status() i.e. :
if (!il_sta) {
D_RATE("leave: No STA il data to update!\n");
return;
}
/* Treat uninitialized rate scaling data same as non-existing. */
if (!rs_sta->il) {
D_RATE("leave: STA il data uninitialized!\n");
return;
}
Thanks
Stanislaw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists