linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: Document bindings for SA8255P UFS Host Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260107-deft-mouflon-of-shopping-baaece@quoll>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 08:38:22 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <ram.dwivedi@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: mani@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, 
	bvanassche@....org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Anjana Hari <anjana.hari@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] dt-bindings: ufs: Document bindings for SA8255P
 UFS Host Controller

On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 07:10:06PM +0530, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> +        ufshc@...4000 {

Completely messed indentation.

Why did we ask to drop the unnecessary soc node? To make it simpler.

Even if you do not believe that code should be simpler, you should
immediately spot the odd indentation.

For such trivialities you cannot get this patch merged. It's third
revision which you send carelessly.

Best regards,
Krzysztof