[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gE-Nwxe-d-_P_z26fZckGq_nhzZ-qV_PEr85VkrYRCEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 13:41:49 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: Discard pm_runtime_put() return value
On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 1:29 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 03 Jan 2026 22:23:52 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: Discard pm_runtime_put() return value
>
> Sorry for noticing late -- looks like the subject prefix being 1/3
> instead of 0/3 is throwing patchwork off.
No worries.
> Patchwork seems to have
> mis-guessed that these are the first 3 patches of the missing ones
> in your full 23 patch series, instead of treating this as a fresh
> posting:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1035812&state=*
>
> Could you resend one more time with the cover letter subject corrected?
Done:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2816529.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki/
Interestingly enough, the kernel.org Patchwork seems to have got that right:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/list/?series=1038125
Powered by blists - more mailing lists