linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 12/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks cruft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b562c545-fabf-4e30-8397-e2d75633e03a@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 13:16:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
 Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Chaotian Jing <Chaotian.Jing@...iatek.com>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>,
 kernel@...labora.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove vendor kernel quirks
 cruft

On 08/01/2026 11:49, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> Both ufs_mtk_vreg_fix_vcc and ufs_mtk_vreg_fix_vccqx look like they are
> vendor kernel hacks to work around existing downstream device trees.
> Mainline does not need or want them, so remove them.
> 
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>

Just in case Mediatek again promotes their downstream vendor kernel as
justification for upstream (which is really unacceptable and was told to
Mediatek more than once):

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof