[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e365223-8e20-4519-b290-d8ecff548d84@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 13:19:10 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
"chu.stanley@...il.com" <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) <Chunfeng.Yun@...iatek.com>,
"kishon@...nel.org" <kishon@...nel.org>,
"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"neil.armstrong@...aro.org" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chaotian Jing (井朝天)
<Chaotian.Jing@...iatek.com>, "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com" <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/25] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework probe function
On 06/01/2026 14:23, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 13:55 +0100, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
>>
>> Remove the ti,syscon-reset cruft.
>>
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Why do we need to remove the reset node? If an error occurs and the
Commit msg should be improved and provide the reason, e.g. because it is
undocumented and unused ABI.
> host
> does not perform a reset, it could lead to error recovery failure.
This is not a reason to use undocumented ABI.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists