linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Document ovp values for PMI8994

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52778327-69bb-4f6c-8d64-094f33809480@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 10:22:09 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Kiran Gunda <quic_kgunda@...cinc.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Eugene Lepshy <fekz115@...il.com>,
        Gianluca Boiano <morf3089@...il.com>,
        Alejandro Tafalla <atafalla@...on.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Document ovp
 values for PMI8994

On 1/8/26 10:17 AM, barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org wrote:
> On 2026-01-08 09:54, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 1/8/26 4:43 AM, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>>> Document ovp values supported by wled found in PMI8994.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>>
>> I reviewed a version of this that said PMI8950, which is very much
>> not the same..
>>
>> Let me try and get some more docs to confirm or deny what you're
>> saying..
> I have sent it for the previous revision msm-4.4 contains the documentation.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/95f7c89fdf9b856f567a498cc56ecfa5@mainlining.org/T/#u

Right, but I didn't send any reply acknowledging that.

On v1, my review tag meant "I concur this is the case for PMI8950"

Because you carried it in v2, it appears as if I said "I concur this
is the case for PMI8994", which is not what I then said.

Konrad