linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Document ovp values for PMI8994

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1d1601c3b871e67c76e4f3572400b2d7@mainlining.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2026 10:30:16 +0100
From: barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>, Jingoo
 Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Kiran Gunda
 <quic_kgunda@...cinc.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Luca Weiss
 <luca@...aweiss.eu>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Eugene Lepshy
 <fekz115@...il.com>, Gianluca Boiano <morf3089@...il.com>, Alejandro Tafalla
 <atafalla@...on.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: backlight: qcom-wled: Document ovp
 values for PMI8994

On 2026-01-08 10:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/8/26 10:17 AM, barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org wrote:
>> On 2026-01-08 09:54, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 1/8/26 4:43 AM, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>>>> Document ovp values supported by wled found in PMI8994.
>>>> 
>>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>>> 
>>> I reviewed a version of this that said PMI8950, which is very much
>>> not the same..
>>> 
>>> Let me try and get some more docs to confirm or deny what you're
>>> saying..
>> I have sent it for the previous revision msm-4.4 contains the 
>> documentation.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/95f7c89fdf9b856f567a498cc56ecfa5@mainlining.org/T/#u
> 
> Right, but I didn't send any reply acknowledging that.
> 
> On v1, my review tag meant "I concur this is the case for PMI8950"
Yes, sorry. Since they are pretty much same i have considered it is a
minor change i have only changed everything to pmi8994 because it
was introduced before pmi8950 at upstream. I will be more careful next 
time.
> 
> Because you carried it in v2, it appears as if I said "I concur this
> is the case for PMI8994", which is not what I then said.
> 
> Konrad