[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aV-UyhP7wllSBpYj@aspen.lan>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 11:28:10 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>
To: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Kiran Gunda <quic_kgunda@...cinc.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Eugene Lepshy <fekz115@...il.com>,
Gianluca Boiano <morf3089@...il.com>,
Alejandro Tafalla <atafalla@...on.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] backlight: qcom-wled: Support ovp values for
PMI8994
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 04:43:20AM +0100, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
> WLED4 found in PMI8994 supports different ovp values.
>
> Fixes: 6fc632d3e3e0 ("video: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8994 compatible")
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> index a63bb42c8f8b..5decbd39b789 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> @@ -1244,6 +1244,15 @@ static const struct wled_var_cfg wled4_ovp_cfg = {
> .size = ARRAY_SIZE(wled4_ovp_values),
> };
>
> +static const u32 pmi8994_wled_ovp_values[] = {
> + 31000, 29500, 19400, 17800,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct wled_var_cfg pmi8994_wled_ovp_cfg = {
> + .values = pmi8994_wled_ovp_values,
> + .size = ARRAY_SIZE(pmi8994_wled_ovp_values),
> +};
> +
Do these *have* to be named after one of the two PMICs that implement
this OVP range.
Would something like wled4_alternative_ovp_values[] (and the same
throughout the patch) be more descriptive?
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists