[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c71554c-4fa1-4b99-9d46-2f1a2ecc1b7f@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 16:20:04 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...mail.net>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
workflows@...r.kernel.org, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v3] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated
content
On 1/7/26 13:15, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Thinking LLMs are 'just another tool' is to say effectively that the kernel
> is immune from this. Which seems to me a silly position.
I had a good chat with Lorenzo on IRC. I had it in my head that he
wanted a really different document than the one I posted. After talking,
it sounds like he had some much more modest changes in mind. I caught
him at the end of his day, but I think he's planning to send out a small
diff on top of what I posted so I can get a better idea of what he wants
to see tweaked.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists