[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f49d18b4-f7b1-4a48-8132-6c081cfb78d8@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 16:59:48 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor
<nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@....com>,
Nikhil Agarwal <nikhil.agarwal@....com>,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] ARM: exynos: Simplify with scoped for each OF child
loop
On 06/01/2026 11:11, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> - for_each_compatible_node(node, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-sysram") {
>> + for_each_compatible_node_scoped(node, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-sysram") {
>> struct resource res;
>> if (!of_device_is_available(node))
>> continue;
> No idea how common this pattern is, but maybe worth
> for_each_compatible_available_node_scoped() ?
> Bit of a pain as you'd need a of_find_compatible_available_node() helper.
> So I'll let you assess if there are enough instances of this to make it worthwhile.
I think there are only like two or three instances, so not really worth
the effort.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists