linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 11/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework probe function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd2eba99adaddf7517f06acf7805d32e261fafa4.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 06:22:49 +0000
From: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>
To: "chu.stanley@...il.com" <chu.stanley@...il.com>, "robh@...nel.org"
	<robh@...nel.org>, Chunfeng Yun (云春峰)
	<Chunfeng.Yun@...iatek.com>, "kishon@...nel.org" <kishon@...nel.org>,
	"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
	<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, "bvanassche@....org"
	<bvanassche@....org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "neil.armstrong@...aro.org"
	<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Chaotian Jing (井朝天)
	<Chaotian.Jing@...iatek.com>, "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com" <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
	"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, "krzk@...nel.org"
	<krzk@...nel.org>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>, "martin.petersen@...cle.com"
	<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, Louis-Alexis Eyraud
	<louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>, "kernel@...labora.com"
	<kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework probe function

On Thu, 2026-01-08 at 13:25 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> Please provide here reason, e.g. undocumented ABI. Normally I would
> ask
> about ABI impact, but considering this is was just copied from some
> downstream code I would just not care.
> 

Is it sufficient for us to supplement the ABI document?
This ABI might affect the ability to reset and recover after 
an UFS error in upstream world.

> Mediatek should really stop and rethink their upstream process.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Yes, you are right.
MediaTek does have some shortcomings in the upstream process.
We will make improvements.

Thanks.
Peter