linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 11/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework probe function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87887adf-2c94-48c2-8f83-4e772ab50f60@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 08:24:25 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
 "chu.stanley@...il.com" <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
 Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) <Chunfeng.Yun@...iatek.com>,
 "kishon@...nel.org" <kishon@...nel.org>,
 "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
 <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 "neil.armstrong@...aro.org" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Chaotian Jing (井朝天)
 <Chaotian.Jing@...iatek.com>, "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 "nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com" <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
 "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
 "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
 "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>,
 "kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework probe function

On 09/01/2026 07:22, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-01-08 at 13:25 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> Please provide here reason, e.g. undocumented ABI. Normally I would
>> ask
>> about ABI impact, but considering this is was just copied from some
>> downstream code I would just not care.
>>
> 
> Is it sufficient for us to supplement the ABI document?
> This ABI might affect the ability to reset and recover after 
> an UFS error in upstream world.


In normal case yes, but I cannot imagine arguments justifying your usage
of TI properties. Basically it would not pass review.

Best regards,
Krzysztof