[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DFL1PC40HZIU.3V030UQ1DWXFG@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 17:21:32 +0100
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Boqun
Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Fiona Behrens" <me@...enk.dev>,
"Christian Schrefl" <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com>, "Alban Kurti"
<kurti@...icto.ai>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] rust: pin-init: rewrite the initializer macros
using `syn`
On Fri Jan 9, 2026 at 6:24 PM CET, Benno Lossin wrote:
> On Fri Jan 9, 2026 at 2:45 PM CET, Gary Guo wrote:
>> On Thu Jan 8, 2026 at 1:50 PM GMT, Benno Lossin wrote:
>>> + zeroed = ::core::mem::zeroed();
>>> + ::core::ptr::write(slot, #path {
>>> + #(
>>> + #fields: ::core::panic!(),
>>> + )*
>>> + ..zeroed
>>
>> Would just ::core::mem::zeroed() here work or does it have same inference issue?
>> IIUC the type inference should work here as ..Default::default() works.
>
> I haven't checked this, will do so.
I checked it (also in the kernel) and it does seem to work, so I'll
change it to your suggestion.
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists