[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260112141630.2869-1-huyuye812@163.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 22:16:29 +0800
From: huyuye <huyuye812@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dai.hualiang@....com.cn,
deng.weixian@....com.cn,
guo.chang2@....com.cn,
liu.qingtao2@....com.cn,
wu.jiabao@....com.cn,
lin.yongchun@....com.cn,
hu.yuye@....com.cn,
zhang.longxiang@....com.cn,
zuo.jiang@....com.cn,
li.kunpeng@....com.cn,
huyuye <huyuye812@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: pci_root: Clear the acpi dependencies after PCI root bridge initialization on RISC-V
Hi Rafael,
Thank you for your thorough review and valuable comments on v1.
I've updated the patch as follows:
1. Removed the redundant #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI and if (!acpi_disabled)
guard as you pointed out. The entire code block indeed already depends
on CONFIG_ACPI at a higher level, making the inner guard unnecessary.
2. Moved acpi_dev_clear_dependencies to RISC-V specific architecture
code (driver/acpi/riscv/acpi_pci.c). This ensures that ACPI dependency
clearing is handled within the appropriate architectural context.
Best regards
Signed-off-by: huyuye <huyuye812@....com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/riscv/acpi_pci.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/riscv/acpi_pci.c
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 9d7f85dadc48..a16eb9097cdc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
const struct acpi_device_id *not_used);
static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device);
+
+void __weak arch_acpi_pci_root_add_clear_dep(struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+}
+
static int acpi_pci_root_scan_dependent(struct acpi_device *adev)
{
acpiphp_check_host_bridge(adev);
@@ -760,6 +765,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
+ arch_acpi_pci_root_add_clear_dep(device);
return 1;
remove_dmar:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
index 1284a076fa88..5b1bd0298fb9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-obj-y += rhct.o init.o irq.o
+obj-y += rhct.o init.o irq.o acpi_pci.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE) += cpuidle.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) += cppc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_RIMT) += rimt.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/riscv/acpi_pci.c b/drivers/acpi/riscv/acpi_pci.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..368ff113e5c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/acpi/riscv/acpi_pci.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026, ZTE Corporation
+ * Author: Yu Ye Hu <hu.yuye@....com.cn>
+ */
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+
+void arch_acpi_pci_root_add_clear_dep(struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+ acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(device);
+}
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index aad1a95e6863..c00b523a6ebd 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -996,6 +996,7 @@ int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void);
int acpi_scan_add_dep(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_handle_list *dep_devices);
u32 arch_acpi_add_auto_dep(acpi_handle handle);
+void arch_acpi_pci_root_add_clear_dep(struct acpi_device *device);
#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
static inline int register_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists