[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22a6a28c-0f03-4571-b2a0-8c9b82788b68@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 19:11:26 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] spi: support controllers with multiple data lanes
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 09:07:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:45:21AM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> > + /* Multi-lane SPI controller support. */
> > + u32 tx_lane_map[SPI_DEVICE_DATA_LANE_CNT_MAX];
> > + u32 num_tx_lanes;
> > + u32 rx_lane_map[SPI_DEVICE_DATA_LANE_CNT_MAX];
> > + u32 num_rx_lanes;
> This adds 72 bytes in _each_ instance of spi_device on the platforms that do
> not use the feature and might not ever use it. Can we move to the pointer
> and allocate the mentioned fields separately, please?
Do we have real systems where we have enough SPI devices for anyone to
care?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists