lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWVNBPfv-R5erugo@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 21:35:32 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>,
	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
	Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] spi: support controllers with multiple data lanes

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 07:11:26PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 09:07:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:45:21AM -0600, David Lechner wrote:

...

> > > +	/* Multi-lane SPI controller support. */
> > > +	u32			tx_lane_map[SPI_DEVICE_DATA_LANE_CNT_MAX];
> > > +	u32			num_tx_lanes;
> > > +	u32			rx_lane_map[SPI_DEVICE_DATA_LANE_CNT_MAX];
> > > +	u32			num_rx_lanes;
> 
> > This adds 72 bytes in _each_ instance of spi_device on the platforms that do
> > not use the feature and might not ever use it. Can we move to the pointer
> > and allocate the mentioned fields separately, please?
> 
> Do we have real systems where we have enough SPI devices for anyone to
> care?

Define "enough" :-) To me even dozen of devices is enough (it gets almost a 1kB
of space) esp. if we are talking about quite low profile embedded systems.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ