[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ13v3RKydFK+sP_Cm-HnQjsOJSDyX_dsGs_Yy564V=Wc7tQFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:21:56 -0600
From: Anirudh Srinivasan <anirudhsriniv@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add Asus IPMI card
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 5:47 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > It's a bit bike-sheddy, however: the pattern tends to be
> > ${vendor},${platform}-bmc, but as the platform can't be specified and
> > the card's function is the BMC itself, I'd go with "asus,ipmi-
> > expansion-card" (I couldn't immediately find a useful identifier other
> > than the product name).
>
> This should include some model name or at least soc. What if you have
> IPMI card for ast2600 and later completely different for ast2700?
Personally, I was okay with Andrew's suggestion of naming it
"asus,ipmi-expansion-card" because that's the official product name
and that exact term works well for online searches.
This seems like a pretty niche product Asus announced 4 years ago and
made in very low volumes. I'm not sure if they'll make a new one with
an ast2700, given how the modern trend is to have BMCs on
motherboards. What do you think about the naming Andrew?
--
Regards
Anirudh Srinivasan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists