linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 02/12] vduse: add vq group support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJaqyWd4VZaqA3E0NCeCH6ur1q7stu1HgHTKEv5hjRQ=eLn+uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:35:37 +0100
From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoqueli@...hat.com>, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>, Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>, 
	jasowang@...hat.com, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, 
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 02/12] vduse: add vq group support

On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 12:44 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 04:24:20PM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > @@ -1252,12 +1266,24 @@ static long vduse_dev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> >               if (config.index >= dev->vq_num)
> >                       break;
> >
> > -             if (!is_mem_zero((const char *)config.reserved,
> > -                              sizeof(config.reserved)))
> > +             if (dev->api_version < VDUSE_API_VERSION_1 && config.group)
> > +                     break;

(Bookmarking the piece of code above as [1] to reference later)

> > +
> > +             if (dev->api_version >= VDUSE_API_VERSION_1) {
> > +                     if (config.group >= dev->ngroups)
> > +                             break;
> > +                     if (dev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)
> > +                             break;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (config.reserved1 ||
> > +                 !is_mem_zero((const char *)config.reserved2,
> > +                              sizeof(config.reserved2)))
>
> Hmm but if api version is 0 then group should be 0 no?
> We should validate.
>

The check (dev->api_version < VDUSE_API_VERSION_1 && config.group) is
above this check in this set of changes [1], am I missing something?
Would you prefer it to be reordered here or written differently?