[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH1PCMatYTfE58-O7ftt4dmr3tvssnD4UrSGEJSbHkFYgT_afQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:59:02 +0800
From: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>
To: Maud Spierings <maud_spierings@...mail.com>
Cc: ajones@...tanamicro.com, alex@...ti.fr, anup@...infault.org,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, conor+dt@...nel.org, conor@...nel.org,
cyy@...self.name, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dlan@...too.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, lkundrak@...sk,
palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, pjw@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
samuel.holland@...ive.com, spacemit@...ts.linux.dev, tglx@...utronix.de,
xypron.glpk@....de, zhangmeng.kevin@...ux.spacemit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] riscv: dts: spacemit: add initial device tree of
SpacemiT K3 SoC
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 3:43 PM Maud Spierings
<maud_spierings@...mail.com> wrote:
>
> > + mimsic: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "spacemit,k3-imsics", "riscv,imsics";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xf1000000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <0>;
> > + #msi-cells = <0>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc 11>, <&cpu1_intc 11>,
> > + <&cpu2_intc 11>, <&cpu3_intc 11>,
> > + <&cpu4_intc 11>, <&cpu5_intc 11>,
> > + <&cpu6_intc 11>, <&cpu7_intc 11>;
> > + msi-controller;
> > + riscv,guest-index-bits = <6>;
> > + riscv,hart-index-bits = <4>;
> > + riscv,num-guest-ids = <511>;
> > + riscv,num-ids = <511>;
> > +
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + maplic: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "spacemit,k3-aplic", "riscv,aplic";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xf1800000 0x0 0x4000>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + msi-parent = <&mimsic>;
> > + riscv,children = <&saplic>;
> > + riscv,delegate = <&saplic 1 512>;
> > + riscv,num-sources = <512>;
> > +
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
>
>
> from reading the chatter on v3 I think the right status here may be
> "reserved", for elements that are reserved by firmware. But I could be
> mistaken.
Thanks Maud. Good catch. I think you are right, both M-mode maplic and mimsic
should be listed as "reserved" to signify that they are intended to be used
in OpenSBI, not the S-mode kernel.
I will fix that in the next version.
BR,
Guodong Xu
>
> Kind regards,
> Maud
Powered by blists - more mailing lists