linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio: Remove MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <176821439707.14558.2281083056388438061.b4-ty@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:40:24 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
To: linusw@...nel.org, brgl@...nel.org,
        Jose Javier Rodriguez Barbarin <dev-josejavier.rodriguez@...gon.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, dev-jorge.sanjuangarcia@...gon.com,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio: Remove MODULE_ALIAS from gpio-menz127


On Thu, 08 Jan 2026 14:48:42 +0100, Jose Javier Rodriguez Barbarin wrote:
> The first patches I sent for fixing the autoload problem encountered
> on mcb device drivers were 2. The first [1] was focused on updating the
> modpost process for letting kbuild to access to the data within
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE and the second one [2] for removing the MODULE_ALIAS
> on all mcb client drivers.
> 
> They were rejected and Andy suggested me to split the second patch
> in a per-driver basis instead of sending all drivers' changes in a
> single patch once the first patch was merged.
> 
> [...]

Subject should be: "gpio: menz127: ...", I fixed it when applying.

[1/1] gpio: gpio-menz127: drop unneeded MODULE_ALIAS
      commit: a88d9589125a4d2d1cc2e0e6ba794be30f4de44f

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>