linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] greybus: Use bus methods for .probe() and .remove()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mgaxmjfozg4amxpiyv6vfhr6rd2hrafl2vppvij3febcn44nli@c3wedzb77xqv>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:58:02 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] greybus: Use bus methods for .probe() and .remove()

Hello,

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> These are nearly identical to the respective driver callbacks. The only
> difference is that .remove() returns void instead of int.
> 
> The objective is to get rid of users of struct device_driver callbacks
> .probe() and .remove() to eventually remove these.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>

gentle ping. Who is supposed to pick this patch up (or criticize it)?

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)