lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026011222-connector-cosigner-93c4@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:06:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
	greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] greybus: Use bus methods for .probe() and .remove()

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:58:02PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > These are nearly identical to the respective driver callbacks. The only
> > difference is that .remove() returns void instead of int.
> > 
> > The objective is to get rid of users of struct device_driver callbacks
> > .probe() and .remove() to eventually remove these.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
> 
> gentle ping. Who is supposed to pick this patch up (or criticize it)?

That's me, my queue is huge, sorry...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ