[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yshteuzbht3l3rvjcj23tqovu3nbvtjpnh4rbkln33r2oo2mqp@op3tqpjd44pv>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:27:50 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] greybus: Use bus methods for .probe() and .remove()
Hello Greg,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 01:06:31PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:58:02PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > These are nearly identical to the respective driver callbacks. The only
> > > difference is that .remove() returns void instead of int.
> > >
> > > The objective is to get rid of users of struct device_driver callbacks
> > > .probe() and .remove() to eventually remove these.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
> >
> > gentle ping. Who is supposed to pick this patch up (or criticize it)?
>
> That's me, my queue is huge, sorry...
If it's still on someone's radar I can be patient. No (additional)
pressure from my side then.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists