[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfseaLWfYuhz=5MxRw9dtBvOM4X6brPwT2PJ4Fq7rGbfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:59:25 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@...dia.com>, Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] i2c: add and start using i2c_adapter-specific
printk helpers
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:45 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bart,
>
> > can be *revoked*. To that end we need to hide all dereferences of
> > adap->dev in drivers.
>
> I haven't actually tested the code yet (but will do so this week). But I
> already want to feed back that I approve of the general concept of
> abstracting away drivers access to the struct device by something we can
> then convert to SRCU in a central place.
>
> This mail is to discuss the timeline of these series. My preferred
> solution is to aim for inclusion right after 7.0-rc1 is released. That
> gives me enough time to test and you some more time to address review
> comments. Bold wish, but maybe we can even get dependencies into 6.19
> before (like the i2c_dbg rename for the saa7134 driver. Is there a patch
> for it already?).
>
> Does that work for you?
Yes, I agree it's too late to queue it for v7.0. I actually wanted to
rename my macro to i2c_debug() to avoid a conflict with saa7134 but
you're right, I may submit a patch for that instead for v7.0.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists