[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWYxgXn_2WlHLcj1@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:50:25 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@...dia.com>,
Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] i2c: add and start using i2c_adapter-specific
printk helpers
> Yes, I agree it's too late to queue it for v7.0. I actually wanted to
> rename my macro to i2c_debug() to avoid a conflict with saa7134 but
> you're right, I may submit a patch for that instead for v7.0.
Your choice. I think keeping 'i2c_dbg' is more consistent but the
dependency on media might not be worth it.
I set your patches to 'Deferred' in patchwork. Meaning that they will be
handled as agreed above.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists