[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f4c22558d20b42615adde772551c1bfb346da47.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:05:32 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker
<frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to
alloc_workqueue
On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 11:28 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 5:20 PM Marco Crivellari
> <marco.crivellari@...e.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Marco Crivellari (3):
> > ath6kl: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
> > cw1200: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
> > wifi: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/usb.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/bh.c | 5 +++--
> > net/wireless/core.c | 4 ++--
> > net/wireless/sysfs.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Gentle ping.
I have none of these pending now - if I didn't accept them then they're
lost. I did try to apply another similar one yesterday but it was
already there in a slightly different format, so maybe things have
gotten out of sync?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists