linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAofZF4Ptjmo=7taHuw_rdya-kGhEZGqXbQn8yPCi1pgA24mkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:16:45 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, 
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, 
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, 
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:05 PM Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> I have none of these pending now - if I didn't accept them then they're
> lost. I did try to apply another similar one yesterday but it was
> already there in a slightly different format, so maybe things have
> gotten out of sync?
>
> johannes

Hi Johannes,

That's likely.
I rebased now on v6.19-rc5 and I can only see in my branch:
"ath6kl: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users".

The others seem already applied.

Well, sorry for the noise.

Thank you!

-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer