[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea0a9ee9-3cb1-4d08-aa6f-91bb91bda816@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:13:11 +0100
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Algea Cao <algea.cao@...k-chips.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Use usleep_range()
instead of udelay()
On 1/13/26 00:20, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> rk_hdptx_dp_reset() is allowed to sleep, hence replace the busy waiting
> with usleep_range(), to allow other threads to run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
> index a65e96694237..89710066d70c 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
> @@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ static void rk_hdptx_dp_reset(struct rk_hdptx_phy *hdptx)
> reset_control_assert(hdptx->rsts[RST_INIT].rstc);
>
> reset_control_assert(hdptx->rsts[RST_APB].rstc);
> - udelay(10);
> + usleep_range(10, 15);
> reset_control_deassert(hdptx->rsts[RST_APB].rstc);
>
> regmap_update_bits(hdptx->regmap, LANE_REG(0301),
>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Thanks,
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists